|
do you ever see dead man walking. u won't see it, because u are the one.
your whole body is dead, ur brain is corrupted and malfunction, only left your mouth still shitting... u are evil.
what articles have *you* posted, you f***ing loser? (nothing)
What *precisely* have you contributed to the site? (justshit)
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
... and fighting like hell to send you back to your "LOW LIFE" cave.
Ask yourself the same question, "LOW LIFE", "What have YOU contributed?" Nothing but a piece of TRASH that you threw some words together, calling it an article but which only shows your ignorance, because as the other poster stated, "Profiling is Pointless!!!" You didn't get it then, and you still don't get it now. So it is YOU who is the f***ing loser, "LOW LIFE", and the one who is contributing sh*t to the site.
If you say it's sh*t I'm contributing, it's to the piece of TRASH you have posted.
What's worst, is that you are adding more SH*T to the same piece of SH*T you call an article.
You are so f***ing IGNORANT, that you believe only someone who has written a book ought to be able to say something about another book.
I am NOT surprised that you are so f***ing IGNORANT, "LOW LIFE", it's why evolution REJECTED you!!!
I am happy to be contributing sh*t to this piece of SH*T you call an article, and I'm even more thrilled to see you are doing the SAME!!!
Go back to your cave "LOW LIFE" and stop contaminating the world outside. You are a REJECT of EVOLUTION.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
supprise! WREY is trying to wakeup from dead..
i know you have gone through the EVOLUTION process. so now times up already, u are dead.
so now your whole body is dead, but unluckily ur mouth somehow can still shitting. it is still an unknown subject over here. all kinds of bacteria and viruses will slowly eating up your body, any finally your mouth will be gone as well. i understand is quite a pain and you are struggling to survive. keep it up WREY!!! you should able to make it through! if you have faith in it, you should try with no end to wakeup from dead.. this is another generation of Mutated Resident Evil.
what articles have *you* posted, you f***ing loser? (nothing)
What *precisely* have you contributed to the site? (justshit)
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
You are simply recycling your own sh*t, "LOW LIFE". Copying from me what I've described you to be. That's all you're doing. Copying from me the things I've described you to be. "PROOF" again that you didn't evolve fully. EVOLUTION HAS REJECTED YOU, "LOW LIFE", but you feel that by copying things that I've described you to be, you can FAKE that you're not an EVOLUTIONARY REJECT. No matter how much you try to copy my description of you as an EVOLUTIONARY REJECT, it's NOT going to save you. You are already MARKED!!!
Your article is a piece of TRASH, "LOW LIFE". How many times do I have to say it for you to understand that it's BETTER to write NOTHING, than to write TRASH. Do you understand that, "LOW LIFE"?
It's BETTER TO WRITE NOTHING, THAN TO WRITE TRASH!!!
Somehow you feel that by submitting a piece of TRASH, you can prove that EVOLUTION did not REJECT you. TRASH is TRASH, no matter which way you look at it.
I just love the fact that you know I'm shitting on your article, and even better that you are helping in the process. Keep shitting "LOW LIFE",it's obvious you are used to being shitted upon.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
WREY wrote:
You are simply recycling your own sh*t, "LOW LIFE". "PROOF" again that you didn't evolve fully.
exactly what you are doing. well done.
WREY wrote:
It's BETTER TO WRITE NOTHING, THAN TO WRITE TRASH!!!
exactly what you are doing. i love this statement. this is more than well done. (i give u 5 on this!)
what articles have *you* posted, you f***ing loser? (nothing)
what *precisely* have you contributed to the site? (justshit)
from,
-= aLbert =-
ps: do you have anything new? otherwise i am bored already... if u keeping repeating at ur joke, ur joke is not new, i can't laugh anymore. hardly visit your joke next time.
|
|
|
|
|
Granted, for some people, this article might have little or no meaning, while for others, it would be the opposite.
But that's besides the point, because for everyone who reads it, IT SHOULD HAVE MEANING, which is what it lacks.
Look at the article, it premises to show the difference in performance by calculating 'pi' using one thread, and then in another instance by using two threads. Other than saying someone would obtain better result running the sample application on a dual processor machine, there is very little information the author reveals about how he proposes proving his point!! His article did not even say he would be using the calculation of 'pi' as the focus of his experiment. You are learning about this from my message.
The statistics he shows at the end of the article, I'm sure has a lot of meaning to him and his work. But if the reader doesn't understand how they are obtained, and what they represent (singularly, or generally), what's the point?
I had to look through his code to derive understanding of what was happening, because running the sample simply showed the calculation of 'pi' (if you could immediately recognize it), followed by a number after each calculation (for which you'd have to look through the code to learn what they represent). The article explains very precious little, which is why I say it is a very poorly written article.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
The statistics he shows at the end of the article, I'm sure has a lot of meaning to him and his work. But if the reader doesn't understand how they are obtained, and what they represent (singularly, or generally), what's the point?
Come on...
The article will only show some light in the tunnel, it won't get you far. By the time I don’t know how to spend my time, then I will spoon feed you one by one. well, have you learn how to do profiling already? i am shame for you. hope you are learning.. (oh gosh, why should i bother such people whether is learning or not? i should let them rotted.)
I only respect doer. Never respect talker.
and I dun talk nonsense.
anyway, thanks for your effort.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
Don't be ashamed for me for not even remembering about profiling. I gave up profiling over 6 years ago when I got my first dual processor machine and saw its benchmarkings. Since then I've never bothered to profile anything simply because the applications I have been running, have ALWAYS done better (as expected) and there was no need to do further profiling. However, for your article, I had to recall somethings about it and soon remembered how to obtain it (long before you even replied).
Don't be ashamed for me!! If you want to be ashamed for anyone, BE ASHAMED FOR YOURSELF!! who wrote a wishy-washy article by throwing some words together without much of anything that explained what it's about. Then when someone points out its lack of meaning, you get all riled up when the truth is exposed.
Face the facts and look at it for what it is, and in the process try and learn something about how to improve your writing skills. You could certainly use some spoon-feeding of your own in that department!!
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
are u rotted already? oh really, ur knowledge was rotted. your comment was totally out of topic. your comment was no value added to this article. thanks for your English literature lesson. here is technical. by the way, are u going to wrong site? writing competition? please wake up.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about, "rotted"? What does "rotted" have to do with the few words you threw together you call an article? Where is your mind at? Are you sure you're on planet Earth?
Get a hold of yourself if you want to sound intelligible!! You make no sense!!
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
oh by the way, what's the result u are getting it run on your machine? i remember u have dual-processor machine right?
come on.. no heart feeling right?
please contribute something to share with others.. today i went to my office but forget to do the profiling to complete the article.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
1. WREY
Status Gold. Member No. 4650
View Member's Blog.
Messages Posted
(while logged in) 871
Articles Submitted
0
Biography None provided
Location United States
Occupation Software development, Software Components, Research
Interests C++, MFC, ATL, COM, Database
Member since Thursday 6th July, 2000
(4 years, 3 months)
Homepage
Hahaha LOL!
take a look at this! you are really a good talker!!! shame u! 871 message posted. 0 article submitted. such contribution u've given, well done man... "i.. feeling.. so.. touch.." CP really lack of this type of people...
listen, CP may want you. but please don't appear in my article. u are not welcome.
i only appreciate technical comment. not english lesson. if you dun like here, please go somewhere else. dun sh*t around. well, 871 is quite a lots of sh*t u have made. again, CONGRAT!!
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
I am only replying to this because there may be hope for you.
If in the event you're on planet Earth, then civilized people on Earth know a few things about something we (here on Earth) call, "opinion". If you are living on a different planet more advanced than Earth, then you ought to know what I'm talking about. If not, then you're not as advanced as you may want others to believe, which would account for the kind of article you have written.
Have you written a book or a play? Have you built a car, or an airplane?
I have done none of those things, myself. But that does not stop me from reading books, or driving cars, or flying airplanes, or attending plays, for which ALL of those things I have done.
And after having done them, are you saying because I have never witten a book, I am NOT suppose to say what I think of the book? That's what civilized people on Earth call, "opinion".
What do people on your planet do with others who have "opinions"? (I don't know if you call them, "people". Maybe, "selected organisms" is how you refer to them as.) What do you do with "selected organisms" that do not say ONLY those things that some other "selected organisms" like to hear?
Looking at your comments, I believe we all know the answer.
KEEP AWAY FROM EARTH!!! You are NOT advanced. You are a "LOW LIFE"!!!
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
why suddenly email me privately? where's your ball?
you just like a typical dutch!! opinion opinion.. ark! do you realise that your opinion has no value added? you were reminding me that something i have known already. just that i didn't want to spend so much efford on writing!! do u understand? you in IT field, as well as i am. we are busy whole day and hardly spend SOME time to surf CP and other stuff, and i hardly squeezzzeee SOME time to write the damn article to share useful information to friendly reader. but who knows! got ONE idiot after gaining/learning something and never appreciate ppl's work, give a damn useless comment(or your so call oppinion, i tell u, i feel like wanna puke!!) the comment, is out of topic! no value added to the article at ALL !!!
>>That's what civilized people on Earth call, "opinion".
i only give oppinion to the right place and the right time. hey, please learn, dun ever give comment that out of topic. you are wasting ppl's time to read those comment. do u realise?
>>If in the event you're on planet Earth, then civilized people on Earth know a few things about
>>something we (here on Earth) call, "opinion".
what people live on earth. see.. bullshit again. *doze* may be you have 48 pairs of chromozoms! that's why your thinking is far more advance than human. you speak like a god. nice try...
>>And after having done them, are you saying because I have never witten a book, I am NOT
>>suppose to say what I think of the book?
>>That's what civilized people on Earth call, "opinion".
did i say u NOT suppose to comment? i really doubt it. i have to repeat myself again,
i said, ur comment was out of topic(no one will interest to read ur comment, u've made big mistake).
and secondly, ur comment has no value added to the article. understand?
thirdly, your comment pointed something that the author knew already(so u did not need to remind him this silly thing, he knew already, just that he's busy, and furthermore he was not paid to write beautiful article, with the free lunch which is very enough already). if u're civilized enough, you should have understand my 3 little simple statement.
>>I am only replying to this because there may be hope for you.
haha, i think it should be the other way round.. again when i look at your reply, it is just a typical bull talker. dun really know much, but did like to give LOTS of OPPITION. Worst thing is that you feeling proud of your own oppinion.
Lastly, i admire u, again nice try...
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
I did NOT send you any private email. You are NOT WORTH that kind of attention.
Show the email you claimed I sent you. Show it!! Let's see it!! I DID NOT SEND YOU ANY PRIVATE EMAIL!!
Not only are you hallucinating, you seriously believe other people care about you that much to be sending you private emails. You are NOT important!!
Earlier I thought there might be hope for you, but more and more it's becoming obvious that you have no redeemable qualities. The "LOW LIFE" that you are, belong in a cave where evolution hasn't yet reached.
LIAR!! LET'S SEE THE PRIVATE EMAIL YOU CLAIMED I SENT YOU!! LET'S SEE IT!!
LIAR!!
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
hi civilized people.. you still here? still shitting around?
can you please just end this argument? how old are you?
do u know that i really admire you?
>>LIAR!! LET'S SEE THE PRIVATE EMAIL YOU CLAIMED I SENT YOU!! LET'S SEE IT!!
haha... when u got such a free time, please go and write some useful article k?
my time is not like your time.
hey, you haven't share your pc's performance with us. why are u so petty? why u keep it to yourself? *selfish* and call himself a civilized person.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
"LOW LIFE", I can understand why you make no sense. Evolution hasn't caught with you as yet, which accounts for the underdeveloped brain you're living with.
The good news (for the rest of us) is that you'll die off because your slow developmental process does not give you much of a chance to be among the fittest.
So long, "LOW LIFE". Take out your frustration on Evolution!!
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
have u nonsensing enough already?
u are running away from my question. what's your pc's result? if you are not going to tell, just get off here at once. here are not for you. other ppl may allow u to sh*t around, but not me.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
This sort of back and forth *belongs* in private email. Regardless if the first post was off topic, continuing the conversation keeps it that way. Why subject other readers to it?
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry to bardge in, the problem is in the title and the subject of the article. Instead of :
"Single Thread vs Dual Thread By f2" should better be named "How to create two threads, by F2" - as there is no such thing as "Dual Thread", it draws peoples' attention, as if it would be a new concept in computer programming. This is dissapointing.
Anyway, there are many psyhotic people out there doing this all the time (it is called hysteria), and they are all dissapointing in the end when people discover there was not such a big deal why they left their business and crowded to see the event.
The downside is that the second time people will not bother anymore and the hysteric will fill deserted. Some moderators should take care of such people, exhibiting their hoaxes.
And instead of "A beginner's introduction to one of the optimization method For Intel Dual Xeon HT Technology", it would better have been left blank, if not named, "tests run on my Dual Xeon, at home", this would have been much honest. Actually there is maybe a subconstient flaw of trying to sell something all the time, which maybe is good if the product inside is exactly what is written on the label, and should be punished if is 80% or more empty. When selling on the street may be ok, cause maybe the customer open his product at home, and maybe he will not find you.
Imagine what if this site would have been located in your home town, everybody could reach you, put their hands on you. This would prevent you from selling 80-90% empty products, or at least putting missleading labels.
So it is not a bad article, or poor, it's just dissapointing, and annoying because make the reader feel like he bought a product, opened it at home and saw it was another product 100 times cheaper. It doesn't matter the amount of money lost (measured in time lost in this case) it is the simple fact!
excuse my poor english
|
|
|
|
|
cucul wrote:
Anyway, there are many psyhotic people out there doing this all the time (it is called hysteria), and they are all dissapointing in the end when people discover there was not such a big deal why they left their business and crowded to see the event.
i put this article under beginner. are u beginner?
cucul wrote:
And instead of "A beginner's introduction to one of the optimization method For Intel Dual Xeon HT Technology", it would better have been left blank
u need a doctor to help u take out the stick out from your ass.
cucul wrote:
When selling on the street may be ok, cause maybe the customer open his product at home, and maybe he will not find you.
did u pay code project for visiting their sites?
cucul wrote:
So it is not a bad article, or poor, it's just dissapointing
my main purpose was to demonstrate the different of performance.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
Q.. from [WREY]
URL : http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/PI.asp?msg=944304#xx944304xx
From: WREY (builder@shocking.com)
I have a dual processor machine, and would like to know how I can obtain those statistics of measurements.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
A.. from [f2]
1. switch to release mode.
2. goto project setting, click on Link tab, check Enable profiling.
3. build exe.
4. menu, build, profile...
5. choose function timing, then OK.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
I kind of had to figure it out myself after investigating a few places and looking through some books. I eventually found how to do it, but appreciate your answer anyhow, since others will learn from it.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
i got another article in CP, i wanted to modify, but i couldn't find where is the [Modify this article]
example...
[Get Article's HTML] [Modify this article] [Delete this article]
help...
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
When your article is moved out of "Unedited Reader Contributions" and into into whichever section it goes by the Code Project editors, the method of editing it changes. At the time the article was moved you should have received an e-mail message advising you of this. That's what happened for me anyway.
Mine said this:
TO UPDATE YOUR ARTICLE
If you need to update this article in future then you'll find a 'Get Article's HTML' link at the top of your article. Clicking on this will present you with a stripped down version of your article that you can edit and then resend to us. Doing so ensures we don't need to repeat any
formatting or editing changes that have been made since this submission. This link only appears when you have logged in using your CodeProject account.
So there you go. Just get the HTML source, edit it as appropriate, include new code and pictures as a zip attachment, and send it off. Make sure your email includes that name of your article and its URL.
The email to send your article to is: submit@codeproject.com
I trust this helps. I'm not officially associated with Code Project btw, just an ordinary member.
|
|
|
|
|