Average article rating: 2.98
Productivity Apps and Services
|
| Microsoft Office |
2 Oct 2007
Updated: 2 Oct 2007
Rating: 2.33/5
Votes: 4
Popularity: 1.40
Licence: CPOL
Views: 17,031
Bookmarked: 22
Downloaded: 0
Using this simple, yet elegant and powerful code, you can provide to your users efficient Office document merging; simply exploiting XML technology and basic string manipulation.
|
|
30 Nov 2008
Updated: 30 Nov 2008
Rating: 3.62/5
Votes: 12
Popularity: 3.62
Licence: Public Domain
Views: 46,335
Bookmarked: 31
Downloaded: 0
Describes the theory of how software development can be simplified even for mission critical applications
|
Average blogs rating:
No blogs have been submitted.
Average tips rating:
No tips have been posted.
Average reference rating:
No reference articles have been posted.
Average project rating:
No projects have been posted.
Architect
Mexico
Born in 1969. First prorgram made in commodore 64 on early 80s (storing it in regular audio cassettes). Then fortran in a PDP in middle 80s. First serious program at the age of 18th in GWBASIC in late 80s. So, almost 20 years programming.
From 2003 to 2006 engaged into a development outsourced by an international company. They couldn't make it.
Hired 2 years ago by one of our COOs to be in charge of the development, so I have control on what is developed and most importantly, how. Of course, the "what" is strongly influenced by what the users need.
I think we can make great things with C Sharp, I am applying all my knowledge and experience in programming for the over 20 years (including experience in implementing business systems) to the C# and .NET Techonology. I don't think we need to complicate our lives very much, we can program in a smarter way and just take advantage of what this language offers without reinventing the wheel.
However, in the last 18 months; I've been more engaged into JavaScript, CSS and a little bit of ASP (for the database connection) finding absolute no need of using the .NET framework yet acomplishing very important advances.
I don't like Visual Studio, by the way. I prefer to code by hand or using simpler IDEs... antiquated? Maybe, but still think it is better. You have the *control* in your hands. And actually, rather than "by hand", I simply mean creation of complex dynamic objects that would resolve UI characteritics dynamically (i.e., a repository of UI objects in the database or via XML or similar; and a big unique object capable to resolve such objects), instead of "dragging and dropping" objects creating a huge source code base.
Visual Studio is still for "programmers" (quoted).
Raised in Mexico but currently living in New Jersey (unitl October 2010)
Submit an article or tip